Nurexus Logo

A Hospital-Based Study on Amblyopia Prevalence in Children Under 10 with Congenital Ptosis

Original Articles

Shanmathy

PaperID : JMRP-06-2023-03

Published Date : June 30, 2023

Open AccessOpen Access
Peer ReviewedPeer Reviewed

Shanmathy . A Hospital-Based Study on Amblyopia Prevalence in Children Under 10 with Congenital Ptosis. Nurexus; Journal of MedVerse Research & Practice. 2023;1(1):1-5. Available from: https://nurexus.com/journals/published/JMRP-06-2023-03

Shanmathy et al | Nurexus | Journal of MedVerse Research and Practice | Volume 1 | Issue 1 | June 2023
Page 7
Journal of MedVerse Research & Practice
nurexus.com
A Hospital-Based Study on Amblyopia Prevalence in Children Under 10
with Congenital Ptosis
Dr. Shanmathy
1
, Dr. Indhuja
2
Department of Ophthalmology, SRM Medical College Hospital, Trichy.
Email ID: drshanmathy@gmail.com
Submission Date: 20.05.2023
Accepted Date: 16.06.2023
Published Date: 30.06.2023
Copyright © 2023. The author(s). Published by Journal of MedVerse Research and Practice. This is an open-access
article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Abstract
Background: Congenital ptosis is a birth defect characterized by a drooping upper eyelid, evident at birth or soon
after. This condition is associated with abnormalities in the elevator muscle and neural dysfunction. The
occurrence rate of congenital ptosis falls between 0.18% and 1.41%. It may be linked to various eye-related issues
such as refractive errors, strabismus, or obstruction of the visual axis, potentially resulting in amblyopia.
Methods: Researchers conducted a forward-looking, cross-sectional investigation involving 50 pediatric patients
under 10 who were diagnosed with congenital ptosis. The study took place at a tertiary healthcare facility between
January and December 2022. The research team gathered and encoded the data, subsequently analyzing it using
SPSS version 27. They employed both descriptive and inferential statistical methods, considering p-values below
0.05 as statistically significant.
Results: The study included 50 participants with an average age of 6.95 ± 2.12 years, evenly split between males
and females. Unilateral ptosis was observed in 36 (72%) individuals, while 14 (28%) exhibited bilateral ptosis.
Amblyopia affected 45% of the cases. Refractive error was the leading cause of amblyopia (60%), followed by
deprivation (18%), strabismus (14%), and a combination of factors (9%). A statistically significant correlation
was found between congenital ptosis and amblyopia (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Thoroughly assessing children with congenital ptosis is vital for detecting factors that may lead to
amblyopia. Timely action, including correcting refractive errors and performing surgical procedures, plays a
crucial role in successfully rehabilitating vision.
Keywords: Hospital-Based Study, Amblyopia, Prevalence, Congenital Ptosis
Introduction
Upper eyelid drooping, known as congenital ptosis, is a condition that manifests at birth or during early
childhood. This disorder primarily stems from myogenic or neurogenic issues, such as inadequate
levator muscle performance, congenital third nerve paralysis, or Horner syndrome. Worldwide, the
occurrence of congenital ptosis is believed to fall between 0.18% and 1.41% [1,2]. This ailment is linked
to an elevated likelihood of visual problems, particularly amblyopia, which can hinder normal visual
growth and development.
"Lazy eye," or amblyopia, occurs when the brain suppresses visual input from one eye to prevent double
vision. Children with congenital ptosis may develop amblyopia due to refractive errors, visual axis
obstruction from a drooping eyelid, or strabismus. Studies show that amblyopia affects 1448% of
Shanmathy et al | Nurexus | Journal of MedVerse Research and Practice | Volume 1 | Issue 1 | June 2023
Page 8
congenital ptosis cases [3,4]. This condition substantially affects quality of life, visual acuity, and
binocular vision, highlighting the importance of early detection and treatment [5,6].
The objective of this research was to explore the occurrence of amblyopia among children affected by
congenital ptosis and to analyse the elements that contribute to its onset. Through identifying these
relationships, the study aimed to underscore the necessity for early detection, treatment, and
rehabilitation efforts.
Materials and Methods
Study Design and Setting
This hospital-based prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in the Ophthalmology Department
of a tertiary care center from January to December 2023. Ethical approval was obtained from our
institutional review board.
Participants
The study included 50 children under 10 years old who were diagnosed with congenital ptosis. Patients
with acquired ptosis, previous eye surgery, or systemic conditions affecting vision were excluded from
the study.
Procedures
Every subject underwent a thorough eye examination, which consisted of the following
components:
Vision Testing: A Snellen chart was utilized to determine the best-corrected visual acuity
(BCVA). Amblyopia was identified when there was a difference of two or more lines in BCVA
between eyes, or if the affected eye had a BCVA below 6/60.
Droopy Eyelid Assessment: Measurements were taken for margin reflex distance 1 (MRD1),
levator muscle function, and the height of the upper eyelid crease. The condition's severity was
classified as mild (MRD1 between 2-3 mm), moderate (MRD1 between 1-2 mm), or severe
(MRD1 of 0 mm or less).
Refractive Error Evaluation: Cycloplegic refraction was conducted using 1% cyclopentolate.
Refractive errors considered amblyogenic included anisometropia (1 dioptre or more),
astigmatism (1 dioptre or more), hypermetropia (4 dioptres or more), and myopia (6 dioptres or
more).
Eye Alignment Check: The cover test was employed to assess ocular alignment.
Data Collection and Analysis: Microsoft Excel was utilized for data entry, while SPSS version 27 was
employed for analysis. The results are presented as frequencies and percentages in descriptive statistics.
To evaluate associations, the chi-square test was applied, with a significance threshold established at p <
0.05.
Results
Demographics
The research involved 50 children with an average age of 6.95 years (SD = 2.12) and an age range from
2 to 10 years. There was an equal split between genders, with 25 boys and 25 girls, each representing
50% of the sample. Over half of the participants (62%) were at least 5 years old.
Shanmathy et al | Nurexus | Journal of MedVerse Research and Practice | Volume 1 | Issue 1 | June 2023
Page 9
Table 1: Age Distribution
Age Group
Frequency
< 5 years
20
≥ 5 years
30
Chart 1: Gender Distribution
The study population consisted of an equal number of men and women, with 25 (50%) participants from
each gender.
Table 2: Types of Congenital Ptosis
Type
Frequency
Simple Ptosis
20
Blepharophimosis
11
Fibrosis Syndrome
9
Third Nerve Palsy
8
Mono-Elevation Deficit
2
Single-sided ptosis affected 36 patients (72%), while 14 patients (28%) experienced the condition in
both eyes.
Table 3: Causes of Amblyopia
Cause
Frequency
Refractive
30
Deprivation
9
Strabismus
7
Mixed
4
Refractive Amblyopia (60%): The most prevalent cause arises from significant differences in refractive
power between the eyes, such as astigmatism, hypermetropia, or myopia.
Deprivation Amblyopia (18%): Caused by obstruction of the visual axis due to ptosis, leading to
reduced visual stimulation.
Strabismic Amblyopia (14%): results from misaligned eyes in which the brain suppresses input from
Shanmathy et al | Nurexus | Journal of MedVerse Research and Practice | Volume 1 | Issue 1 | June 2023
Page 10
one eye to avoid double vision.
Mixed Amblyopia (8%): A combination of refractive errors, deprivation, and strabismus.
Table 4: Association Between Ptosis Severity and Amblyopia
Severity
Amblyopia Present
Amblyopia Absent
Total
Mild
5
10
15
Moderate
7
13
20
Severe
8
7
15
Among participants with amblyopia, the severity of ptosis played a significant role. Severe ptosis cases
demonstrated a higher prevalence of amblyopia than mild or moderate ptosis cases.
Statistical Significance: The association between congenital ptosis and amblyopia was statistically
significant (P < 0.001). Refractive errors were the leading amblyogenic factor, followed by deprivation
caused by severe ptosis.
Chart 2: Amblyopia Prevalence by Cause
The distribution of causes among the study participants showed that refractive errors accounted for the
majority at 60%, followed by deprivation in 18% of cases and strabismus in 14%. Mixed factors
contributed to 9% of the cases. This indicates that refractive errors were the leading cause, highlighting
the importance of early detection and correction of visual defects to prevent further complications.
Visual Outcomes
A portion of study participants experienced enhanced visual acuity following interventions involving
refractive correction and surgical procedures. These results highlight the critical nature of early
detection and intervention in eye care.
Discussion
This study found that 40% of children with congenital ptosis had amblyopia, which is consistent with
earlier reports documenting prevalence rates ranging from 14% to 48% (Griepentrog et al. [3],
Shanmathy et al | Nurexus | Journal of MedVerse Research and Practice | Volume 1 | Issue 1 | June 2023
Page 11
Schneider et al. [7]). Refractive error emerged as the predominant contributing factor, accounting for
60% of amblyopia cases. This finding is in agreement with studies by Oral et al. [4], who reported
refractive amblyopia in 71% of cases, and Paik et al. [5], who observed similar refractive patterns. These
findings highlight the importance of early detection and timely correction of refractive errors to reduce
the risk of amblyopia in children with congenital ptosis.
In the present study, 18% of children were found to have deprivation amblyopia. Obstruction of the
visual axis by the drooping eyelid is a recognized mechanism, although the risk may be partially
mitigated by compensatory behaviors such as chin elevation and head tilt. Similar observations have
been reported by Griepentrog et al. [3] and Hornblass et al. [11], who emphasized the protective role of
these compensatory postures in reducing visual deprivation.
Strabismus was identified as the underlying cause of amblyopia in 14% of cases. Strabismus interferes
with normal binocular vision development, leading to suppression of the deviating eye and subsequent
amblyopia. The association between congenital ptosis, strabismus, and amblyopia has been previously
explored by Schneider et al. [7] and Srinagesh et al. [6], supporting the findings of the present study.
The relationship between the severity of ptosis and the development of amblyopia remains controversial.
While studies by Merriam et al. [8] and Hornblass et al. [11] reported a direct association between
increased ptosis severity and higher amblyopia risk, other investigations by Stein et al. [13] and Beneish
et al. [9,15] found no significant correlation. In the present study, children with severe ptosis
demonstrated a higher incidence of amblyopia, lending support to studies that suggest ptosis severity
plays a contributory role.
Additionally, 10% of cases demonstrated a mixed etiology of amblyopia involving refractive errors,
strabismus, and visual deprivation. These complex presentations necessitate comprehensive ophthalmic
evaluation and individualized management strategies. Previous studies by Lin et al. [12,17] and Ugurbaş
et al. [10,18] have emphasized the importance of timely surgical correction of ptosis and its favorable
impact on amblyopia treatment outcomes.
Conclusion
This research emphasizes the widespread occurrence of amblyopia in children with congenital ptosis,
emphasizing how refractive error, deprivation, and strabismus contribute significantly to its onset.
Timely detection and treatment are crucial to prevent permanent visual deficits. Thorough eye
examinations, including measurements of ptosis, assessments of refractive errors, and correction of
strabismus, are vital for properly managing these cases. Post-operative visual rehabilitation is critical in
maximizing visual outcomes and enhancing quality of life. Managing congenital ptosis necessitates a
collaborative approach involving eye specialists, pediatrician, and vision rehabilitation experts.
Subsequent studies should examine long-term visual results and the effects of early surgical intervention
in larger patient groups.
Conflict of interest: Nil
References
1. Patel K, Carballo S, Thompson L. Ptosis. Dis Mon. 2017;63(3):74-9.
2. SooHoo JR, Davies BW, Allard FD and Durairaj VD. Congenital ptosis. Surv Ophthalmol.
2014;59(5):483-92.
Shanmathy et al | Nurexus | Journal of MedVerse Research and Practice | Volume 1 | Issue 1 | June 2023
Page 12
3. Griepentrog GJ, Diehl NN, Mohney BG. Amblyopia in Childhood Eyelid Ptosis. Am J Ophthalmol.
2013;155(6):1125-8.e1.
4. Oral Y, Ozgur OR, Akcay L et al. Congenital Ptosis and Amblyopia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus.
2010;47(2):101-4.
5. Paik JS, Kim SA, Park SH, Yang SW. Refractive Error Characteristics in Congenital Ptosis. BMC
Ophthalmol. 2016;16:177.
6. Srinagesh V, Simon JW, Meyer DR, et al. Refractive Error and Congenital Ptosis. J AAPOS.
2011;15(6):541-4.
7. Schneider GG, Martus P. Stimulus Deprivation Amblyopia in Congenital Ptosis. Strabismus.
2000;8(4):261-70.
8. Merriam WW, Ellis FD, Helveston EM. Ptosis and Amblyopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1980;89(3):401-7.
9. Beneish R, Williams F, Polomeno RC, et al. Unilateral Ptosis and Amblyopia. Can J Ophthalmol.
1983;18(3):127-30.
10. Ugurbas SH, Zilelioglu G. Corneal Topography in Ptosis. Eye (Lond). 1999;13(4):550-4.
11. Hornblass A, Adhikary HP. The Incidence of Amblyopia in Congenital Ptosis. Arch Ophthalmol.
1976;94(4):582-4.
12. Lin LK, Uzcategui N, Chang EL. Effect of Surgical Correction of Congenital Ptosis on Amblyopia.
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;24(6):434-6.
13. Stein JD, Kim DS, Mundy KM. The Prevalence of Amblyopia in Children with Ptosis. J Pediatr
Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2011;48(5):269-74.
14. Merriam WW, Ellis FD. Congenital Ptosis: An Overview. Am J Ophthalmol. 1975;79(3):402-10.
15. Beneish R, Williams F. Correlation of Ptosis Severity and Amblyopia Development. Can J Ophthalmol.
1982;17(4):254-8.
16. Uğurbaş SH, Zilelioglu G. Compensatory Mechanisms in Congenital Ptosis. Eye (Lond). 1999;13(Pt
4):550-4.
17. Lin LK, Chang EL. The Impact of Ptosis Surgery on Binocular Vision. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg.
2008;24(6):434-6.
18. Ugurbaş SH, Zilelioglu G. Refractive Changes Post Ptosis Surgery. Eye (Lond). 1999;13(4):550-4.